Articles

“Opposer Blows Away Applicant in Priority Battle”, International Trademark Association (INTA) Bulletin, Vol. 69, No. 6, March 15, 2014, p. 13.

“Changes to Patent Law on March 16, 2013”, Linda’s Paralegal Resources, February, 2013.

“TTAB Says MONSTER Marks Are Famous”, International Trademark Association (INTA) Bulletin, Vol. 68, No. 23, Dec. 15, 2013, p. 18.

“Single Shipment to Israel Establishes Priority of Use for ULTRACLEAN”, International Trademark Association (INTA) Bulletin, Vol. 68, No. 17, Sept. 15, 2013, p. 16.

“USPTO Conforms to ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct”, International Trademark Association (INTA) Bulletin, Vol. 68, No. 10, June 1, 2013, p. 16.

“Pro Se Applicant Wins Dismissal of Opposition; Evidence on DVD Excluded”, International Trademark Association (INTA) Bulletin, Vol. 67, No. 21, Dec. 15, 2012, p. 17.

“First Circuit Rejects Heightened Standard of Proof for Proving Willful Trademark Infringement”, International Trademark Association (INTA) Bulletin, Vol. 67, No. 18, Oct. 15, 2012, p. 13.

“Court Finds No Infringement for Knockoffs in Movie Scene”, International Trademark Association (INTA) Bulletin, Vol. 67, No. 14, Sept. 15, 2012, p. 12.

“General Consumers Unlikely to Distinghish Between Skateboarding Styles for Similar Silhouette Design Marks”, International Trademark Association (INTA) Bulletin, Vol. 67, No. 14, August 1, 2012, p. 11.

“Misstatement of First Use Date is Not Fraud”, International Trademark Association (INTA) Bulletin, Vol. 67, No. 8, May 1, 2012, p. 10.

“COLOMBIANO COFFE HOUSE Denied Registration Based on Certification Mark COLOMBIAN for Coffee”, International Trademark Association (INTA) Bulletin, Vol. 67, No. 8, May 1, 2012, p. 10.

“Not All Mangos are Alike or Smell the Same”, International Trademark Association (INTA) Bulletin, Vol. 67, No. 8, April 15, 2012, p. 16.

“HANGBOARD Mark Barely Glides Through for Approval for Supplemental Register”, International Trademark Association (INTA) Bulletin, Vol. 67, No. 3, February 1, 2012, p. 13.

“Although Foreign Equivalent, French Mark for Wine Wins”, International Trademark Association (INTA) Bulletin, Vol. 66, No. 21, December 1, 2011, p. 10.

“Court Says Consumers Know Havana Club Rum is Not From Cuba”, International Trademark Association (INTA) Bulletin, Vol. 66, No. 17, October 1, 2011, p. 10.

“TTAB Cuts Up Saw Manufacturer’s Registration Arguments”, International Trademark Association (INTA) Bulletin, Vol. 66, No. 16, September 15, 2011, p. 11.

“United States: Establishmetn of IP Enforcement Committee”, International Trademark Association (INTA) Bulletin, Vol. 66, No. 14.

“United States: Cancellation Claims Precluded as Res Judicata”, International Trademark Association (INTA) Bulletin, Vol. 66, No. 9.

“Establishment of IP Enforcement Committees”, International Trademark Association (INTA) Bulletin, Vol. 66, No. 7, April 1, 2011, p. 15.

“Gas Station ‘Pole Spanner’ Design Found Nondistinctive”, International Trademark Association (INTA) Bulletin, Vol. 66, No. 4, Feb. 15, 2011, p. 11.

“Initials Can Make Name Not Merely a Surname”, International Trademark Association (INTA) Bulletin, Vol. 65, No. 20.

“Initials Can Make Name Not Merely a Surname”, International Trademark Association (INTA) Bulletin, Vol. 65, No. 19, Nov. 1, 2010, p. 11.

“U.S. Companies Win $78 Million Verdict Against Chinese Cybersquatters”, International Trademark Association (INTA) Bulletin, Vol. 65, No. 19, Nov. 1, 2010, p. 11.

“Open for Business”, American Lawyer Magazine Intellectual Property Supplement, Fall 2010, pps. 31-32.

“Subpar Examination Practice Frustrates TTAB”, International Trademark Association (INTA) Bulletin, Vol. 65, No. 16, Sept. 15, 2010, p. 15.

“Ruling Allows Bacardi to Continue Using HAVANA CLUB Mark”, International Trademark Association (INTA) Bulletin, Vol. 65, No. 14, Aug. 1, 2010, p. 10.

“Proceedings Resume in Oldest Pending TTAB Case”, International Trademark Association (INTA) Bulletin, Vol. 65, No. 13, July 15, 2010, p. 11.

“TTAB Rejects Applicant’s Menu of Arguments for Restaurant Mark”, International Trademark Association (INTA) Bulletin, Vol. 65, No. 10, May 15, 2010, p. 10.

“TTAB Puts Brakes on Tire Company’s Opposition”, International Trademark Association (INTA) Bulletin, Vol. 65, No. 10, May 15, 2010, p. 11.

“Picture Not Worth a Thousand Words as Applied to a Web-Based Specimen”, International Trademark Association (INTA) Bulletin, Vol. 65, No. 5, March 1, 2010, p. 13.

“Ninth Circuit Broadens Scope of Civil Penalty for Counterfeit Goods Bearing Registered Trademarks”, International Trademark Association (INTA) Bulletin, Vol. 64, No. 2, Jan. 15, 2009, p. 8.

“Annual Review of Developments in Business and Corporate Litigation, 2009 Edition”, ABA Committee on Business and Corporate Litigation, Intellectual Property Law, Chapter 21, Sub-Section 12.2 Eleventh Circuit Patent Decisions.

“And You Thought Your Federally Registered Mark Was Safe . . .”, Intellectual Property & Technology Law Journal , Vol. 17, No. 8, August 2005, pps. 22-24.

“Sworn Declarations to Trademark Office Have Potential to be Fraud”, Daily Business Review, Miami, Vol. 80, No. 32, Tuesday, July 26, 2005, pps. A7 and A11.

“What Your Corporate Attorney Never Told You About Patents, Trademarks, and Copyrights”, Broward County Bar Association Barrister.